Harry Winnows
Harry Winnows
DeSantis: “Florida rejects Joe Biden’s attempt to rewrite Title IX. We will not comply and we will fight back. We are not going to let Joe Biden undermine the rights of parents.”
Harry Winnows
Harry Winnows
Did Biden use an executive order to instruct EVERY federal agency to funnel public money to private left-wing NGOS to target Democrat voters? If this is anything like the 2020 ZuckBucks operation, it’s likely. But his DoJ has stonewalled any FOIA requests on the issue.
Harry Winnows
What is going on with voter registration in Texas? The state BY FAR has the most number of people trying to register to vote without an ID. After this went public, the Social Security Administration stopped updating its numbers for the first time in over a decade.
Harry Winnows
This hero is standing up for women’s rights!
NEW: Oklahoma schools chief @RyanWaltersSupt has directed all districts not to comply with Biden’s Title IX rewrite, telling @dcexaminer Biden is "eradicating women’s rights and putting women in danger."
Oklahoma schools chief Ryan Walters is directing all school districts not to comply with the Biden administration's rewrite of Title IX.
Harry Winnows
After @dawnstaley said men should be able to play women’s basketball, @outkick asked every women’s Sweet 16 coach if they also agreed men should be able to play women’s basketball. All 15 women’s coaches declined to comment. What cowardice. Truly:
Harry Winnows
2017: 47.4 million U.S. students
2023: 46.8 million U.S. students
𝟔𝟎𝟎𝐊 𝐋𝐄𝐒𝐒 𝐒𝐓𝐔𝐃𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐒
2017: 6.1 million school employees
2023: 6.4 million school employees
𝟑𝟎𝟎𝐊 𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐄 𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐅𝐅
The result? Only 26% of 8th graders are proficient in math (vs 33% in 2017).
Harry Winnows
Freedom of speech scares the hell out of them. So much so, you would think they have something to hide. @schellenberger CIA RECRUIT IS PURSUING GLOBAL INTERNET CENSORSHIP AS "E-SAFETY" CZAR IN AUSTRALIA American–born Julie Inman Grant is a key architect of the multigovernmental “Global Online Safety Regulators Network” to censor the speech that politicians and government bureaucrats fear. X owner Elon Musk should be thrown in prison, said a senator in Australia yesterday, because he refuses to delete a video of a recent stabbing from X globally. “Whatever Elon Musk is on,” said Senator Jacqui Lambie, “it’s disgusting behavior. Quite frankly, the bloke should be jailed and the key thrown away.” But what’s truly disgusting behavior is calling for the incarceration of someone for refusing to censor the entire global Internet on behalf of a single nation. It is not the right of any nation to decide what should be on the Internet around the world. “No president, prime minister, or judge,” responded Musk on X, “has authority over all of Earth!” He’s right. It’s true that violent content online can be disturbing. I think platforms should put warning labels on them and find some way to prevent minors from seeing it. I also think there are real privacy concerns that should be addressed. But violence is not the only thing the Australian government has told X to remove. It has also targeted political speech. And nothing can justify the Australian government censoring the entire global Internet of content it does not like. Many of us, myself included, have long suspected that government censors in Ireland, Scotland, and the European Union would attempt to censor the whole of the Internet, not just in their own countries. With Brazil and now Australia demanding the power to censor the whole internet, it’s clear that our fears were more than justified. And now, Public has learned that there is a formal government censorship network called the “Global Online Safety Regulators Network,” which Australia’s top Internet censor, Julie Inman Grant, who is an American, described at World Economic Forum. The group includes censors from Australia, France, Ireland, South Africa, Korea, the UK, and Fiji. But before getting to that, it’s first important to understand just how powerful she is. Here is Julie Inman Grant, boasting of her extraordinary censorship powers. “Yes, we do regulate the platforms. We have a big stick that we can use when we want to….They’re going to be regulated in ways that they don’t want to be regulated.” In a different video, Inman Grant said, “We also have some pretty significant ISP blocking powers. We just had some new powers given to us… in addition to be able to compel that takedown, to be able to fine perpetrators as a deterrent effect, and fine content hosts that don’t take down this content, um, we can, um, We also have something in this new legislation called the basic online safety expectations.” She goes on to say that she is already