Harry Winnows

11 hours 43 minutes ago

This from Canada’s FBI. If we continue on our current trajectory this will America and should taken as a warning.

Harry Winnows

1 day 8 hours ago

The ADL is claiming that “100%” is racist and white supremacist. Beyond parody. The ADL is 100% a joke.

Harry Winnows

1 day 17 hours ago

Train derailments
Supply chain crisis
Planes falling apart in the sky
Ships crashing into bridges

Like living in an Ayn Rand novel

Harry Winnows

1 day 17 hours ago

@shellenberger

It’s All Much Worse Than I Thought

The corporate media are all-in on government censorship

Over the last three years, we have come to learn of the role that our own government officials have played in demanding censorship by social media platforms. Some of this censorship was overt, particularly as it related to COVID. However, some of it was also done in secrecy, as we discovered in the Twitter Files. Many of us thought that once we had uncovered the censorship, governments would be sufficiently embarrassed to stop doing it. And to some extent, that has been the case.

But now, governments around the world are stepping up their efforts to demand more censorship. Last week, the Federal Bureau of Investigation quietly announced it had resumed its outreach to social media companies. Scotland’s Police could even investigate comedians under a new hate speech law if someone complains about a joke. Major media outlets are currently working with government-funded censorship activists at the University of Washington and Stanford Internet Observatory to demand greater censorship in the name of “saving Democracy.”

Without a doubt, those of us who have uncovered censorship have had an impact. On “60 Minutes” last Sunday, the government-funded advocates of censorship at the University of Washington said they have stopped demanding censorship of social media platforms. Simply drawing awareness to who is demanding censorship and who is funding them has weakened their power.

But governments, government-funded NGOs, and the news media have been relentless in their demands for a crackdown on speech they deem hateful and false. At the Supreme Court last week, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed unironic concern that the First Amendment restricts the government’s ability to censor. And everyone from the New Yorker to the New York Times to NBC is suggesting that the only people who are worried about government censorship are Trump supporters, which is obviously false.

The 60 Minutes segment was particularly shocking. Lesly Stahl never mentioned the mass censorship of accurate information about COVID’S origins, COVID vaccines, and lockdowns. She falsely suggested that shining a light on the censorship activists was tantamount to persecution. And she suggested that if the government didn’t do more to censor misinformation, Trump supporters would overthrow the government, which is a form of disinformation aimed at scaring people into giving up our first and most fundamental freedom.

There are many reasons why they are doing this….

Harry Winnows

2 days 16 hours ago

This is probably the most unconstitutional move I’ve seen our government make .
Forget due process. You’re guilty because, well… someone said so.
You cannot confront your accuser nor plead your case.

Justice Department Launches the National Extreme Risk Protection Order Resource Center

Harry Winnows

2 days 18 hours ago

Scoop: It’s a generally accepted truth that Joe Rogan’s podcast is the biggest on Earth (!) But how massive is his audience?

Last month, Spotify quietly started testing a feature that discloses how many followers podcasts on the platform have.

His show is almost 3X bigger than the next most popular.

Harry Winnows

3 days 10 hours ago

Harry Winnows

3 days 10 hours ago

🔥🔥🔥
Florida has a different approach:

"If someone is breaking into your house, you’re more than welcome to shoot. We prefer you to do that, actually."

Harry Winnows

3 days 13 hours ago

Harry Winnows

3 days 13 hours ago

Chicago announces the existence of an additional 10k mail-in ballots that were "mistakenly" not mentioned until now.

Many (if not most) of the ballots are from dropboxes, meaning postmarks are NOT required…

This will have MAJOR implications.

Just 4,000 votes total now separate the 2 candidates in the Attorney General race.

O’Neill Burke (tougher on crime) initially had a significant lead, but ballots keep trickling in & Clayton Harris keeps getting closer.